Search for: "U.S. v. Sharp*" Results 141 - 160 of 2,608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Julie Suk, After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It (University of California Press, 2023).Julie SukMany thanks to Jack Balkin for hosting this symposium on After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It, and to Paula Monopoli, Deborah Dinner, Victoria Nourse, Katharine Young, and Linda McClain for their comments and questions which are as generous as they are challenging. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm by Josh Blackman
Train, 426 U.S. 167, 178–179, 96 S.Ct. 2006, 2012–2013, 48 L.Ed.2d 555 (1976); Mayo v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Americans overwhelmingly want sharp reductions of unregulated money in election campaigns, with federal enforcement of rules and disclosure of all donors to campaigns. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm by Josh Blackman
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:45 am by centerforartlaw
As performance art pieces can vary widely in their meanings, experience, and processes, there is no strict definition of performing arts or “works of the performing arts” as the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 1:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Discussion By my count, this lawsuit is the fourth COVID-19-related securities class action lawsuit to be filed so far in 2023, and the 65th overall to be filed since the initial COVID-19 outbreak in the U.S. in 2020. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
Search warrant for digital devices in electronic threats case was properly tailored to the defendant’s property and established a nexus between the crime under investigation and the items to be seized; denial of motion to suppress affirmed U.S. v. [read post]