Search for: "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. CASTLE" Results 141 - 156 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
This is true at the time of the commission of the offence, and remains true when the offender is imprisoned, as has been recognised in the case of Hirst v United Kingdom (No. 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 41. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Title IX states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be . [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
On June 15, 2023, the court issued the ultimate judgment not only on the torts claims but perhaps the state of our politics. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
However, it is a modified comparative negligence state so they must show that they are 50 percent or less at fault. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
  Prejudice has no place in the United States of America. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm by Carl Vennitti
Prior to July of 2003, V&V Enterprises, Inc., did business as Mauro Brand Products and been marketing and selling “pocket sandwiches” since coming under inspection by the USDA in 1991. [read post]