Search for: "US v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO. " Results 141 - 160 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2010, 7:45 am by Carter Ruml
Although it’s a recap of 1L property law, it may be useful to review the summary of estates in real property involving more than one owner that the Kentucky Supreme Court provided in Sanderson v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am by Carter Ruml
Although it’s a recap of 1L property law, it may be useful to review the summary of estates in real property involving more than one owner that the Kentucky Supreme Court provided in Sanderson v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:04 pm by Berin Szoka
Net Neutrality, Slippery Slopes & High-Tech Mutually Assured Destruction, Berin Szoka & Adam Thierer, Progress Snapshot 5.11, Oct. 2009. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
  Tozzi notes that "Between 2002 and 2007, the number of American farms increased by 76,000, according to the latest data from the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:08 pm by Robert J. McKennon
As a result, Hyundai sought a defense from its liability insurers under a comprehensive general liability policies (“CGL”) issued by National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh and American Home Assurance Co. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The agreement with Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray and OEPA director Chris Korleski, will require A&L Salvage to forfeit more than $4 million in financial-assurance bonds so the money may be used to cap the landfill’s 42-acre disposal area. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
  While the Supreme Court has not ruled that every one of the Bill of Rights is “incorporated” into the Fourteenth Amendment, it began in 1897 (Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. [read post]
In an article entitled “Courting Cooperators: The SEC’s Effort to Motivate Individual Cooperation,” we analyzed the challenges the SEC faces in trying to mirror in the civil enforcement context a practice more widely used in the criminal context. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
The company’s Wallingford plant contained a production line that used to manufacture resins. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:44 am
There is no set of facts under which such events can possibly be construed as "sudden and accidental" (see, Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc. v American Home Assur. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Khuzami also outlined organizational changes under consideration with a focus on making the Enforcement Division more “strategic, swift, smart and successful,” including: • creating specialized groups of attorneys along product, market or transactional lines and increasing collaboration among staff across regions; • flattening the management structure of the Division and reducing the… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]