Search for: "US v. Armstrong" Results 141 - 160 of 572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2022, 8:25 am by CMS
It was held that the previous judge was correct in stating that dishonesty could not properly be alleged by adding the knowledge of one innocent person to another (citing Armstrong v Strain [1952] 1 K.B 232 and Greenridge Luton One Ltd v Kempton Investments Ltd [2016] EWHC 91 (Ch)). [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 7:25 pm by Pamela Fasick
Microsoft argued that this requirement could be found in Korea Supply Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
  In Armstrong,the court held that the manufacturer of an intraocular fluid used during cataract surgery was not strictly liable for design defect under comment k. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am by Kiran Bhat
Joshua Armstrong of the Cronkite News Service (via the Tucson Sentinel) reports on the Court’s denial of cert. in Gila River Indian Community v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Jonathan Peters in The Columbia Journalism Review explores the First Amendment issues raised by a pending cert. petition in Armstrong v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:40 pm by Howard Knopf
Here’s the relevant portion of a recent article about all this by Tom Allen, who is President and CEO of the Association of American Publishers:At trial, Tracey Armstrong, president and CEO of the Copyright Clearance Center, testified that anyone seeking to use copyrighted materials could obtain permissions on a case-by-case basis through CCC's Web site or subscribe to a "blanket license. [read post]