Search for: "US v. France" Results 141 - 160 of 3,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2009, 3:59 am
This morning the IPKat rejoices that the wait is over for the initially expedited and subsequently delayed Opinion of the Advocate General in Joined Cases C-236 to 238/08 Google France, Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) in June of last year. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:06 pm
The conclusion reached in the case of Ligue Contre Le Racisme v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:54 pm
The IPKat is grateful to his readers for providing him with further information on the reference to the European Court of Justice by the Cour de Cassation, France, of Case C-235/09 DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA (noted by a very tired Kat at the end of a long day here). [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 4:00 am
  Here is an interesting case, Frances Northrop, respondent, v Eric Ole Thorsen, appellant. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
On Monday, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 6:25 am
Some banking services carry an element of riskAbanka DD v Abanca Corporacion Bancaria SA [2017] EWHC 2428 is a recent High Court appeal from the UK's Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am by Ronald Mann
As noted in my preview last week, GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA is the Supreme Court’s first arbitration case of the 2019 term. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 9:45 am
If Licensee acquires the Software in France, Germany or Japan, this License Agreement is governed by the laws of the country in which Licensee acquired the Software. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm by Team
They wanted to submit a 14,000 signatures petition urging Russia to execute ECHR judgment Alekseyev v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Judge Katzmann distinguished both Google France SARL v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and Interflora Inc and Anor v Marks & Spencer, determining that the wording used in the EU legislation was not an equivalent to the Australian wording, especially with the difference in 'using in the course of trade' (per Article 5 of the first Trade Mark Directive) and 'used as a trademark' under section 120 of the Australian Act. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 6:13 am by Gregory Forman
In April 2011, the South Carolina Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Eileen Frances Theresa Busto Theisen v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Morel Court Rejects Agence France-Presse’s Attempt to Claim License to Haiti Earthquake Photos Through Twitter/Twitpic Terms of Service — AFP v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:51 am
Yes, today's the day of Advocate General Cruz Villalón’s Opinion in Case C-235/09 DHL Express (France) SAS v Chronopost SA. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
I often explain to whoever is unlucky enough to be stuck with me at a cocktail that, in my experience, there was no difference in how we used case law in “pure” civil law matters (if there is such a thing) versus how I used case law when practising IP before the Federal Court. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 9:12 pm by James Kwong
Patents   GuestKat Rose Hughes provided a review of the US Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit decision in Juno v Kite. [read post]