Search for: "US v. Harris" Results 141 - 160 of 4,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Perlow, Dechert LLP, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: anti-ESG, Board of Directors, ESG, Financial institutions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder litigation Entire Fairness Can be Satisfied Without Use of a Special Committee Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Thursday, July 13, 2023 Tags: Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, Firm valuation, Merger litigation,… [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:41 pm by Bill Marler
Harris, JP, et al., “Deaths from Norovirus among the Elderly, England and Wales,” EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, Vol. 14, No. 10, pp. 1548-1552 (Oct. 2008). [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Lawyers for MGN told the court the company has “paid a very heavy price” for the hacking scandal, while advocates for Prince Harry argued he was entitled to £320,000 in aggravated damages. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
Now suppose that the US Supreme Court had endorsed ISL in Moore. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am by Austin Sarat
”How many of us would accept an invitation worth at least $100,000, like the one Alito accepted, from someone they barely knew? [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:47 pm by Bill Marler
Full text available online at http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/15/1/08-0299_article.htm Harris, JP, et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Prince Harry faced two days of cross-examination this week as Fancourt J continued to hear the trial in the case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
  There is also a piece  on the Reuters site, “Factbox: Why is Prince Harry giving evidence in court? [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:43 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  Although neither the Florida nor the Federal Civil Rights Acts specifically mention sexual harassment, the United States Supreme Court in Harris v. [read post]