Search for: "US v. London"
Results 141 - 160
of 4,308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2023, 9:24 am
Ayinla v London Borough of Newham. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
Pix Credit here “The Wheel of Time turns, and Ages come and pass, leaving memories that become legend. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Humans are used to doing this as they differentiate between categories of humanity before the transformative revolution of the digital. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
Using the principles outlined in Banks v Cadwalladr [2022] EMLR 21 [100]-[135], the Judge considered three questions relevant to establishing the public interest defence: (1) Was the statement complained of on a matter of public interest, or did it form part of such a statement? [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:47 pm
OpenAI relies on the precedent set in Authors Guild v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:18 pm
Floyd Alexander-Hunt is an LLM candidate at Queen Mary University London and a research assistant at King’s College London. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
See also South Hetton Coal Co v North-Eastern News Association [1894] 1 QB 133; Jones v Halton [1909] 2 KB 444; Browne v DC Thomson & Co [1912] SC 359; Irish People’s Assurance Society v City of Dublin Assurance Company Ltd [1929] IR 25 (SC); Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1944] AC 116, [1944] UKHL 1 (03 April 1944); Awolowo v Zik Enterprises… [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:57 am
Moreover, companies could use their power “to influence the political and regulatory sphere where businesses engage political processes in support of policies that respond to their own interest and priorities, even when such policies are inconsistent with human rights protection and promotion”.[3] Recognizing that every time companies exercise power raises questions related to the rule of law, we initiate this Fall Talks Series on the Rule of Law and Corporate Actors. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 2:36 pm
City of New London Had Gone the Other Way? [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
Under that framework, US companies can take advantage of an opt-in certification regime enforced by the US Federal Trade Commission and Department of Transportation. The regulations will come into effect on 12 October 2023. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] United States of America v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 10:16 am
On a) the first instance Judge had correctly held that there were deficiencies in Reading’s formal Equality Act assessment, but also correctly found, following London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Patrick (2019) EWHC 1263 (QB) (our note) that the PSED did not have to be in the form of a single formal exercise. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 10:39 pm
United KingdomUnison v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:50 am
The case is captioned Gambrill v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 8:33 am
London Borough of Lambeth [2022] EWHC 1085 (Admin). [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
Golieb Fellow in Legal History, NYU School of LawMore information is available here.If you convene a legal history workshop or lecture series, please send us your lineup! [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm
Training should include education on the correct language and terms used in regard to relevant minority groups. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:18 pm
Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London Subscribing to Pol’y No. 187581, 56 F.4th 1280, 1290 (11th Cir. 2023) (citing Pearl Assurance Co. v. [read post]
