Search for: "US v. Lynch" Results 141 - 160 of 1,459
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  If you oppose slavery (and Dred Scott), you should oppose Roe v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Benjamin Wittes analyzed Judge David Carter’s March 28 opinion on Donald Trump and John Eastman in Eastman v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 10:49 am by Amy Howe
Arizona, the justices agreed to take up the case of a death-row inmate in Arizona who had asked the justices to weigh in on a dispute over whether Lynch v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:40 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It holds the plaintiff in this case cannot sue the United States Tennis Association because the USTA was not a joint employer with the security company that hired him and assigned him to work tennis matches in New York.The case is Felder v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 6:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals disagrees and the case returns to the criminal docket.The case is United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
He has used his political positions to protect the fuel, and a single power plant in West Virginia that burns it, from regulations that also threatened his family business. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Judge Lynch’s Concurrence/Dissent: Judge Lynch concurred in the panel’s ruling on the non-compete and name restriction issues. [read post]