Search for: "US v. McGuire" Results 141 - 160 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Id.Appellate courts use a “no evidence” standard for review of the trial court’s factual determinations. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 5:30 pm
The panelists included Raymond McGuire, the co-head of Global Investment Banking at Citigroup, Toby Myerson, the co-head of Paul Weiss‘ Mergers and Acquisitions Group and Scott V. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted the appointing authority’s motion to dismiss Trainee’s petition and Trainee appealed.Sustaining the Supreme Court’s decision, the Appellate Division said that Trainee had no greater rights than those of probationary employees, and a probationary employee, consistent with the limitation set out by the Court of Appeals in York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, "may be discharged for any or no reason at all in the absence of a showing that [the]… [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We have so far left open the possibility that injuries caused by the intentional acts of a third party might in some cases satisfy the requirements for ADR, and continue to do so today (see Matter of Walsh v Scoppetta, 18 NY3d 850, 852 [2011]; see also McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563, 567 [1984] [the focus of the inquiry is on "the precipitating cause of injury"]; Arthur A. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We have so far left open the possibility that injuries caused by the intentional acts of a third party might in some cases satisfy the requirements for ADR, and continue to do so today (see Matter of Walsh v Scoppetta, 18 NY3d 850, 852 [2011]; see also McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563, 567 [1984] [the focus of the inquiry is on "the precipitating cause of injury"]; Arthur A. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:54 am
In order to comply with supbcription agreements you will need to use your own Westlaw password to view the full text of cases listed below: Wednesday, February 07, 2007   1. People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am by Amy Howe
” The Court also relisted O’Keefe v. [read post]