Search for: "US v. Michael Branch" Results 141 - 160 of 766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2018, 3:26 pm by Mukarrum Ahmed
The blog post includes specific references to the actual journal article to enable the reader to branch off into the detailed discussion. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
The Supreme Court doesn’t carry on in a vacuum but exists in dialogue with the elected branches and, through them, with the public. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 3:29 pm
The review uses only footnotes (and not end-notes) as a method of citation. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Last week, as readers of this blog surely know, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm by Josh Blackman
Section 3 cannot be used to deny President Trump access to the ballot V. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm by Larry Catá Backer
U.S.) as long as they remain nominally subordinate to the principal branches of government and as long as there is some (barely) intelligible principal (Whitman v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
(Note that the FDCPA is a federal law that applies through the US, but the state analogues of the federal fair debt collection act vary in significant ways even though they cover many of the same abusive and misleading practices. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 2:32 pm
Michael Litchfield on Access to Lawyers in Rural British Columbia Also on today’s show, we speak with Michael Litchfield from the Canadian Bar Association, BC Branch about the Rural Education and Access to Lawyers (REAL) Initiative. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
Ought policymakers in the executive branch take tweets from both accounts seriously as guidance, or only from the one? [read post]