Search for: "US v. Richmond" Results 141 - 160 of 1,076
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2021, 1:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Firstly, s.160 EPA was permissive, not mandatory In Knight v Goulandris itself, it was accepted by counsel for the appellant that the use of the word “may” in section 15(1) is some indication that the provisions which follow were intended to be permissive only. [read post]
Court of Appeals in Richmond has vacated a decision rejecting as time-barred false association and false advertising claims by Bayer Consumer Care, AG, against competitor Belmora LLC over use of the mark FLANAX for naproxen sodium pain relieves in the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 3:57 am by newgenblog
Court of Appeals in Richmond has vacated a decision rejecting as time-barred false association and false advertising claims by Bayer Consumer Care, AG, against competitor Belmora LLC over use of the mark FLANAX for naproxen sodium pain relieves in the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 5:06 pm by Adam Levitin
" It's impossible (I think) to square this with the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm by Giles Peaker
A two bedroom house in Wingfield Road in Gravesham 4. 186a Richmond Road in Gillingham The decision was upheld and Ms B brought a s.204 appeal. [read post]