Search for: "US v. Robert Parker"
Results 141 - 160
of 218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
Defendant, Robert E. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am
Under 42 CFR Sec. 424.535(a) (7), CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider or supplier knowingly sells to or allows another individual or entity to use its billing number (other than in the case of a valid reassignment of benefits). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
Justice Thomas with opinion in Parker Drilling v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
ROBERT JEFFERSON v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
For example, in South Florida, law enforcement has previously found that some Medicare providers and suppliers have taken steps to hide their ownership through the use of straw owners. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:23 am
Bilski v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:49 pm
Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972), Parker v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
If the plan is enacted, its effects will be with us for a generation. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
Dixon and the Cowan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:58 am
The defense is that (1) the MSA is not a compact requiring congressional approval under the leading modern case, Parker v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
Parker Award. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:12 am
Scheinfeld and Parker H. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 8:57 am
The case is Parker, et al., v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:48 am
Nebraska v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Chairman of the Board of Cato Institute, Robert Levy. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
" Instead, we remember to help us derive meaning from and make sense of all the moments in our lives. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
” One constituent urged the court to reconsider because her tax dollars had been used to support homosexuals. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 9:24 am
[Cite to Saponaro v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
You could already begin to see the influence of that audience when the case (then captioned Parker v. [read post]
