Search for: "US v. Strange"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 2:31 pm
That does seem strange, doesn't it? [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:33 pm
Funny as in "strange" but also as in "ha ha". [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
In its decision in OPO v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 1:43 pm
US v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Wilson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:00 am
She previously authored The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program and Hansberry v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 6:43 am
Not every party can rely on Lord Lloyd Webber to arrange some conveniently out-of-copyright Purcell for the occasion (though the Rondeau from Abdelazar is better known as the theme used by Benjamin Britten for his Young Person's Guide to the Orchestra, which makes it a strange choice for a Conservative Party campaign tune though it's certainly stirring enough). [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:06 pm
Finnis references Begum v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 1:47 pm
Unfortunately, the First is just teasing us, with issues of delayed v. absent disclosure, because it says that the problems would not have been prejudicial. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
Strangely enough, however, we are required by precedent to conclude that the two definitions are functionally equivalent. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:43 am
Mabry v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:30 am
US v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 8:18 pm
BLAUER v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:07 am
On January 11, 2016, the Fourth Circuit decided Armstrong v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:06 am
You may recall that, back in BCC v Shafi (our note here), the Court of Appeal** held that a local authority could not use s.222, Local Government Act 1972 to obtain an injunction against members of a gang if (as in Shafi), it was possible to obtain an ASBO under s.1, Crime and Disorder Act 1998 instead. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:06 am
You may recall that, back in BCC v Shafi (our note here), the Court of Appeal** held that a local authority could not use s.222, Local Government Act 1972 to obtain an injunction against members of a gang if (as in Shafi), it was possible to obtain an ASBO under s.1, Crime and Disorder Act 1998 instead. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:06 am
You may recall that, back in BCC v Shafi (our note here), the Court of Appeal** held that a local authority could not use s.222, Local Government Act 1972 to obtain an injunction against members of a gang if (as in Shafi), it was possible to obtain an ASBO under s.1, Crime and Disorder Act 1998 instead. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:55 am
Indeed, it is impossible to understand last Term’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: Matter of Kyle K. v. [read post]
