Search for: "Ultimate Smoke, LLC" Results 141 - 149 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2016, 7:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Not surprisingly, so-called ESD’s (electronic storage devices” such as laptop and desktop computers, company servers, individual smartphones and tablets and any other hard drive, thumb drive or virtual storage contraption or facility) have time and again provided law enforcement with the 21st century equivalent of the proverbial smoking gun. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Chairman of the Board of Cato Institute, Robert Levy. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, 752 F.3d 82, 89 (1st Cir. 2014) (affirming exclusion of expert witness who failed to account for confounding in event studies), aff’g 853 F. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 7:40 am by Phil Dixon
While the present case involved less explicit evidence of racial discrimination in jury selection than previous federal cases finding a violation, it is not necessary for the defendant to show “smoking-gun evidence of racial discrimination. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:06 pm by Steven M. Taber
“It means the cleanup will get done and ultimately children and their families will have a safe place to play without risk of exposure to lead-contaminated soil. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am by Steven M. Taber
(PCI) and Poli-Gold, LLC (Poli-Gold) for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act at Panguitch Lake in Garfield County, Utah. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed StarkIs a company’s post-breach forensic report subject to discovery in subsequent breach related litigation? [read post]
27 May 2024, 5:45 am by Norman L. Eisen
Last week, both the prosecution and the defense rested their cases in former President Donald Trump’s New York trial for allegedly falsifying business records (FBR) in his effort “to unlawfully influence the 2016 presidential election,” in the words of Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan’s case summary. [read post]