Search for: "United States Department of Fish and Wildlife" Results 141 - 160 of 712
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2021, 12:31 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
Fish and Wildlife service over the delisting decision to remove gray wolves in the lower 48 states from the Endangered Species Act, and we will continue to press the Biden Administration’s Department of the Interior to restore federal protections for this species. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 8:00 am by Matthew Campbell
” NARF Staff Attorney Sue Noe explained, “Judge Wogan correctly affirmed quantification of the Tribal water rights based on the habitat needs of the fish, wildlife, and plants. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 2:27 pm by Unknown
Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (Treaty Rights; Qualified Immunity; Civil Rights) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlWorkforce Safety and Insurance v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 10:44 am by kblocher@hslf.org
Cosponsored the Preventing Future Pandemics Act which would, in part, end commercial wildlife markets and mobilize 50 new United States Fish and Wildlife Service attaches to combat wildlife trafficking. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 12:30 pm by Geoff Schweller
However, when viewed in a larger context, this case underscores many of the failures of the United Stateswildlife whistleblower reward programs. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 12:17 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department has reported nearly 200 cases of CWD in Texas among both wild and captive deer populations since 2012. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:20 pm by Jeff Gittins
The Department of Natural Resources has a budget of about $280 million and employs between 1,100 and 1,500 (depending on the number of seasonal employees) and houses the Divisions of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands; Geological Survey; Oil, Gas and Mining; State Parks; Water Rights; Water Resources; and Wildlife Resources. [read post]
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 10:59 am by kblocher@hslf.org
Fish and Wildlife Service to provide Congress with an explanation of its current policies for allowing imports of sport-hunted trophies of species like lions and elephants into the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 3:07 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
The Humane Society of the United States and Humane Society Legislative Fund are committed to ending the cruel practice of horse soring. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Others, running from EPA to Fish and Wildlife, have various niche but important roles. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Stuart Kaplow
The Fish and Wildlife Service is the federal agency delegated the primary responsibility for managing migratory birds consistent with four international migratory bird treaties (between the United States and Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia) and the implementing the MBTA enacted in 1918. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Fish and Wildlife Service issued a final environmental impact assessment for its proposed rule that would reinterpret the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 to prohibit only the intentional killing of birds. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm by Arthur F. Coon
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (The Newhall Land and Farming Company, RPI) (2d Dist. 2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 1245, (“CBD”), (my 12/11/17 post on which can be found here), followed Preserve Wild Santee’s “reasonable, commonsense reading of Section 21189.9” and rejected plaintiffs’ “rigid” and “restrictive” contrary view derived from LandValue 77. [read post]