Search for: "United States Supreme Court, any and all Judicial Officers thereof" Results 141 - 160 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
In determining the applicability of the Due Process Clause, the United States Supreme Court first asks whether the asserted individual interests are encompassed within the Fourteenth Amendment's protection of life, liberty or property. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of… [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:12 am by Gene Quinn
In addition to Section 285 of Title 35, a more generally applicable and content-neutral statute is Section 1927 of Title 28: “Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States or any Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys’… [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:48 am by Steven Calabresi
It then disqualifies all appointed civil or military officers; it then disqualifies insurrectionists from serving as a member of any State legislature, and it finally disqualifies in insurrectionists from serving as State executive or judicial officers. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am by Michael Stern
The PRA states that “[t]he United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm by Barry Sookman
 It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
A brief summary of the discussion of some landmark judgements delivered by the Supreme Court on the subject is given below. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In addition, these operationalizing features could logically flow—at a later time – from the adoption of a simple amendment such as the first paragraph of Rick’s formulation: it guarantees to “all citizen, adult, resident, nonfelons of the United States. . .the right to vote in all elections for federal, state, and local offices within their residential areas. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Now that Trump is out of office, the lawsuits are likely moot. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2 (the “Supremacy Clause”) provides that “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any… [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by Russell Knight
“As early as 1872, the [United States Supreme] Court recognized that it was ‘a general principle of the highest importance to the proper administration of justice that a judicial officer, in exercising the authority vested in him, [should] be free to act upon his own convictions, without apprehension of personal consequences to himself. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
It provides, in relevant part: Every person who, under color of any [state law] subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, . . . [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am by Ed Stein
Any attempt to answer this is necessarily speculative, but the Supreme Court’s decision in Holder v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
Who is to be convicted according to the text of Article II, Section 4, if not the “President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States”? [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Its performance, or lack thereof, has real world consequences. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 12:43 pm by Mike Mireles
Prometheus decisions by the United States Patent and Trademark Office and some judges of the U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Article I, for example, provided that Clinton “willfully corrupted and manipulated the judicial process of the United States” by “impeding the administration of justice. [read post]