Search for: "United States of America v. Cross" Results 141 - 160 of 961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm by Rick
  It is worth noting that in the recent United States Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:43 am by Don Geiger and Eric Gill
To prove damages at trial, Cyntec presented a market-share lost profits theory, alleging that 27 companies purchased Chilisin’s accused chokes outside the United States and then imported devices including the chokes into the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 5:55 am by Nicholas Rasmussen
Five years ago today, white supremacist extremists from across the United States traveled to Charlottesville, Virginia for the “Unite the Right” rally. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States, makes that point only then to go on and draw the distinction. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Ginsburg’s position here recalls her (also unexplained) flip between the Scalia and Breyer camps in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Robert J. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:45 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
United States Department of Health and Human Services et al., in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (No.1:16-cv-00878). [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:28 am by lennyesq
Court Of Appeals, Second Circuit Panel Rejects Oneida Bid for Compensation For Upstate Land Oneida Indian Nation of New York, Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Oneida of The Thames—Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, United States of America —Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE UPPER DECK COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants, v.ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 8:54 am
" The ruling affirms an injunction entered by the district court in May 2007, enjoining future planting of Monsanto alfalfa, called "Roundup Ready alfalfa," pending the preparation by the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), of an environmental impact statement (EIS). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
" EDF Release: Supreme Court Win for Cross-State Air Pollution Rule<> Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 12:55 pm by Richard Bortnick
On July 23, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued an important decision in Eyeblaster, Inc. v. [read post]