Search for: "United States v. 38 CASES, ETC."
Results 141 - 160
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 10:13 am
A very interesting and, as best I can tell, almost entirely unnoticed court case, Campion, Barrow & Assocs. of Ill. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Characters and the worlds that have been built around them can be sold for use in movies, television programs, books, advertisements, etc. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 12:32 am
Tompkins principles in Rimbert v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 9:57 am
But empathy for the downtrodden white male is always acceptable in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
As previous case law had shown, if a s.20 duty has arisen and the Council has provided accommodation, it cannot side step the duty by claiming to have acted under some other power [R(H) v Wandsworth BC [2007] EWHC 1082 (Admin); R(D) v Southwark LBC [2007] EWCA Civ 182; etc.]. [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:38 am
§ 27.3 (Department of Treasury and related entities); 38 C.F.R. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:05 am
Solid Waste Services, Inc., 38 F. 3d 93, 94 (2d Cir. 1994). [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
United States, 216 F.R.D. 478, 480 (D. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 4:22 pm
The case is DiCosolo v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
Similarly, in Nixon v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:18 am
That inconvenience, however, is one of the fundamental protections that separates the United States of America from totalitarian regimes. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:08 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
More than the case of past salary wars, the legal industry seems to have reached a surreal tipping point. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
[16] Moreover, unlike the theory prevalent in the United States today, the Romans were not concerned with writing down laws for the masses to read for themselves. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
