Search for: "United States v. ARTICLE OR DEVICE, ETC."
Results 141 - 160
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
"[The following article includes a table which lists out the statutorily permissible uses of polygraph examination in the different state jurisdictions of the United States of America: Henry T. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
As we said, the object of granting the concessional rate of duty was to protect the smaller units in the industry from the competition by the larger ones and that object would have been frustrated, if, by adopting the device of fragmentation, the larger units could become the ultimate beneficiaries of the bounty. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:31 pm
(EDTexweblog.com) Motorola – ITC institutes investigation 337-TA-745 against Apple on Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof (ITC 337 Update) Samsung – Samsung moves to partially terminate investigation in flash memory investigation (ITC 337 Update) Toshiba – ALJ Rogers rules on motions for summary determinations regarding non-infringement, affirmative defenses and importation in… [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am
I saw your web site and articles you wrote to your blog. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The three sources of international law are stated and defined in the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (R3dFRLUS), Section 102. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
This link provides ample evidence about this from various news articles. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:13 pm
But as the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:30 am
That is, the article of manufacture claim covers the CD-ROM sold at the computer store, a server on the Internet, etc. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:19 am
Quon, the United States Supreme Court decided that the City of Ontario, California could review the non-work-related text messages to and from a City police officer on a City-issued electronic pager. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
Pa. 2008); Colon v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:21 pm
However, the Court appears to recognize that there are other ways of demonstrating intent, as through reference to state law, arbitral rules, etc. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
In the first installment of the series, Berin and I critiqued an old idea that’s suddenly gained new currency: taxing media devices or distribution systems to fund media content. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
U.S. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(Docket Report) Update to recent patent damages article (Patently-O) US patent counts, Q1 2010 (Patent Librarian's Notebook) Bilski predictions: Justice Stevens (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC reverses District Court finding of indefiniteness: Hearing Components, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:17 pm
See, e.g., Medellin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
But instead of just taxing “televisions”—which would be very difficult in a world of technological convergence where consumers can “watch television” on any number of devices (PCs, mobile phones, portable gaming devices, portable media players, etc.) [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
