Search for: "United States v. American Commercial Lines" Results 141 - 160 of 766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  Again, the bottom line is that the Pill is much less expensive than having and caring for a baby. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
  As the Brennan Center has noted, state critical infrastructure laws borrow from the federal concept of critical infrastructure: segments of the economy “so vital to the United States that their incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect” on national security and public safety, thereby deserving enhanced legislative protection. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
The Act passed along party lines in March 2010. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: comfortable with the necessity of line-drawing to implement a “copying not ok, adaptation ok” rule. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
While many of these provisions are consistent with the laws of Bangladesh, several key provisions are drawn from either the law of the United States or norms included in a number of international treaties (only some of which have been ratified or incorporated into the laws of either the United and or Bangladesh). [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:19 pm by Caleb Trotter
In 2011, Tam sought to register The Slants as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:44 am by Abbie Peterson
Headquartered in Seattle, Washington, Weyerhaeuser is one of the world’s largest private owners of timberlands, owning or controlling nearly 12.4 million acres in the United States and managing 14 million acres in Canada. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am by Alex Loomis
”  Granted, not all data is covered by the European Directive (bank transfers and hotel bookings, for example, are excluded), but about 4500 companies nevertheless rely on the safe harbor framework to transfer commercial data from Europe to the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Introduction In Part IVA (here) we considered whether the question in Stolt-Nielsen was one for the court or the arbitrators to decide, and predicted that at least five Justices of the United States Supreme Court will hold that the court must decide it. [read post]