Search for: "United States v. Christopher Strong"
Results 141 - 160
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
United States District Court, W.D. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am
Christophe Bigot, a prominent French media attorney not involve [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Department of State, respectively: ? [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
" Back in the United States, politicians are walking on eggshells. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm
http://bit.ly/Qt5gXf (Christopher Wolf) L.A. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
The Supreme Court of the United States declined today to end the judicial practice of deferring to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations in “friend of the court” briefs filed with a court in Christopher v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:36 pm
Quick, Linden, MIET3 Christopher DeAngelis, Dumont, NJGMM1 Thomas J. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:36 pm
Quick, Linden, MIET3 Christopher DeAngelis, Dumont, NJGMM1 Thomas J. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am
Fernandez Marques, Pfizer Gmbh (Germany) Christopher Hanes, GlaxoSmithKline (United States) Branding clinical trials: benefits in making the physician like the drug/recall it later. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:26 pm
Superior Court, (2005) 36 Cal.4th 148, which was overruled by the United States Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
Here is the abstract: The United States has a strong tradition of state regulation that stretches back to the Commonwealth ideal of Revolutionary times and grew steadily throughout the nineteenth century. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
The plaintiffs have two main arguments, which they summarize: The Act improperly authorizes that civilians in the United States be detained indefinitely by the military, that they be tried by military commission or military court and that they may be subject to removal to other jurisdictions in violation of the Amendments V and VI of the Constitution. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
On the one hand, the discovery sought was limited to narrow issues, the Hague Convention procedures were likely to be more time-consuming, and the United States has a “strong national interest” in providing a remedy for anticompetitive behavior in the international telecommunications market. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:46 pm
Texas' statute appears to be one of the broadly written and strong ones. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Credit Suisse Securities v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am
– http://bit.ly/rINI9h (Gibbons) Airline E-mails Could Play a Big Part in Buffalo, NY Plane Crash Lawsuit - http://bit.ly/rt05By (Christopher Danzig) An eDiscovery Trick or Treat? [read post]
