Search for: "United States v. Democratic Executive Committee" Results 141 - 160 of 675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
As Election Day turns into Election Night, do you worry about a similar scenario playing out in the United States? [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:03 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
United States means for the future of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
The second is the Office of the United States Trade Representative, which is in the Executive Office of the President. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 6:17 am by Kenneth Propp
Rather it may also comprise executive measures, as is the case in the United States for national security access under Executive Order 12333. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Jordan Brunner
The Supreme Court nomination comes as fallout continues over Trump’s executive order banning immigrants and refugees from seven majority-Muslim countries from entering the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
In a crushing blow to consumers, on Thursday, February 21st, the United States Supreme Court again sided with big pharmaceutical medical device makers. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
As Justice John Marshall wrote in the landmark 1819 case McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Jon May
Currently, Republicans have control of the legislative and executive branches in 22 states and the Democrats in 17, so it is likely that Trump would be on the ballot in at least 22 states.What happens if the other 17 states decide that he is disqualified and cannot be on the ballot? [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:47 am by William Ford
Bipartisan bills in the House and Senate seek to reclaim Congress’s role in determining when the United States uses force abroad. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 3:41 pm
Contents include:Guy Goodwin-Gill, International Law Association (Australian Branch) Annual General Meeting AddressAnn Kent, Compliance v Cooperation: China and International LawDonald Keever, The Regulatory Coherence of Multilateral RegulationJo En Low, Engaging with the United Nations Treaty Bodies: A Fruitful Dialogue? [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Scott R. Anderson
All of this has been framed as falling within the scope of what the executive branch has consistently described as the 2002 Iraq AUMF’s dual purposes: “helping to establish a stable, democratic Iraq and addressing terrorist threats emanating from Iraq. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:50 am by William Ford
Julia Solomon-Strauss and Stephen Szrom discussed the latest developments in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Herb Lin, Amy Zegart
Capitol in the United States (in this title referred to as the “Commission”). [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:46 pm
 Article 2 situates the Central Committee between the National Congress and the Central Committee  and the Politburo and its Standing Committee elected by the Central Committee. [read post]