Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 141 - 160
of 765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2022, 8:01 am
" The court quoted language from the United States Supreme Court's decision in Prince v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:09 pm
How often do violations of customary international law occur within the United States? [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
District Court for the District of Columbia referenced my most-noted formulation of this principle in a foreign-cubed piracy case, United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 2:20 am
However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that there are serious divergences in the application of supposedly uniformed European law in various member states – in particular in Germany, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.On the nature of the obligations, the Karlsruhe appeals courts appears to be stricter than its British and Dutch counterparts. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:41 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum is written by Michael D. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:15 pm
The company does, however, offer ADRs in the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
United States, continued to keep Court watchers and commentators busy yesterday. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm
It seems that the rationale for the statute when it was passed was to provide a remedy for aliens, usually ambassadors, who were the victims of tortuous activity within the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:02 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, lower courts have split over how to apply the majority’s cryptic holding that the Alien Tort Statute is presumed not to apply to conduct on the territory of another country, unless the plaintiff’s claims “touch and concern” the United States with sufficient force to overcome that presumption. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:11 am
Before responding to particular participants, I should introduce an important intervening precedent – United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum (issued today by a 2nd Circuit panel of Judge Cabranes writing for himself and Judge Wood, and a concurrence in the judgment by Judge Leval). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:21 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:52 pm
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 542 U.S. 241, 247 (2004).Petitioner‐Appellee Kiobel seeks documents belonging to Royal Dutch Shell (a foreign company) from Shell’s United States counsel, Respondent‐Appellant Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, the court held that aliens cannot bring suit in a United States court for conduct that occurred entirely, or primarily, in another country, unless the domestic conduct is sufficient to displace the strong presumption against extraterritoriality. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:08 am
On December 19, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order in the case of Doe I v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:44 pm
Why else would the Supreme Court direct us to Morrison precisely when it was discussing claims that allegedly “touch and concern” the United States? [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 3:15 am
New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 7:12 am
Urgenda Foundation v Kingdom of the Netherlands Recently, on October 9, 2018, The Hague Court of Appeal made an unprecedented ruling in finding that the preservation of a stable climate system is a fundamental human right and ordered the Dutch government to meet its commitment of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:21 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., during which multiple justices discussed amicus briefs from the European Commission, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:50 pm
Eugene Kontorovich (Northwestern) — who has guest-blogged here several times — passes along this item about today’s United States v. [read post]
