Search for: "United States v. Epstein"
Results 141 - 160
of 297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
McAdams, Reforming Entrapment Doctrine in United States v Hollingsworth, 74 U Chi L Rev 1795 (2007) Thomas J. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
This document has been electronically entered in the records of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 6:38 am
Garland, the dispute over a law that would ban TikTok in the United States on national security grounds if its parent company, ByteDance, doesn’t sell the app by Jan. 19. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 6:05 am
From Momotaz v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:12 pm
United States Cargo & Courier Service, Inc., 2004 PA Super 66, 845 A.2d 900, 903 (Pa.Super. 2004) (stating that "[o]nce an appeal is filed from a final order, all prior interlocutory orders are subject to review"). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm
Among other things, it explains why the mandate runs afoul of the five part test established in the Supreme Court’s most recent Necessary and Proper Clause decision, United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am
” Writing for the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein critiques the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:14 pm
United States Tobacco Co. 17 Sup. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:14 am
Epstein, 56 AD3d 60 [2nd Dept.,2008]). [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:54 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
The rule, as drafted, would prohibit employers throughout the United States from relying on or enforcing covenants to not compete. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:46 pm
As Richard Epstein explained some years ago in connection with the Supreme Court's decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
United States, which ran last month, we also plan to host symposia on the battle over the Defense of Marriage Act and Proposition 8, as well as the impact of recent class action and arbitration decisions at the Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:35 am
Reading the recently unpublished (not precedential) Appellate Division matter of Connaughton v. [read post]
