Search for: "United States v. Flood Building"
Results 141 - 160
of 239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
These State Department warnings were ignored by museums hungry to build world-class collections of European art. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:20 am
The Sixth Circuit first laid out the law on the discretionary exception function, as defined by the Supreme Court in 1991 in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm
USGS Open-File Report: 2014-1189 Pesticide trends in major rivers of the United States, 1992-2010 2014, Ryberg, Karen R.; Vecchia, Aldo V.; Gilliom, Robert J.; Martin, Jeffrey D. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
On the same day Nicola Davies J concluded the hearing of the CMC in the case of Building Register v Weston. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:38 am
<> United Fire & Casualty Company v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
”BackgroundContractor agreed to build a house for Buyers, at a contract price exceeding $800,000. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
”BackgroundContractor agreed to build a house for Buyers, at a contract price exceeding $800,000. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
However, the explanatory notes to the Act indicate that the new defence is intended to reflect the common law as set out in Flood v Times Newspapers [2012] UKSC 11, in which Lord Mance stated that it would seldom be in the public interest “…to publish material which has not been the subject of responsible journalistic enquiry and consideration. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court was sensitive to just this concern when it defined religion broadly for purposes of the conscientious objector statute governing military service in the 1965 case of United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:39 am
The parties reached the Agreement following a procedure established by the United States Department of Agriculture’s Soil Conservation Service (“SCS”), now known as the National Resource Conservation Service, under what is referred to as P.L. 83–566 (the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act, 16 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:06 pm
The United States Constitution, Article 5 states, “No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Ceballos—a 2006 United States Supreme Court decision—does not apply in the setting of public employees who are teachers and scholars. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 5:36 am
After the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia declared the massacre at Srebrenica a genocide in the 2004 Prosecutor v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am
The even bigger problem is that Congress has treated insurance as a sacred cow since 1945, when the federal government overruled the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
United Fire Lloyds. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The Center proposed to demolish its existing 13,745 square foot single story building with a 68,206 square foot mixed use five story project, including 50 residential units. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
The EIR examined a full build out scenario. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
Building Industry Assn of Superior Cal. v. [read post]
