Search for: "United States v. Gould" Results 141 - 160 of 352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am by Anna Christensen
United States, a mandatory-minimum case which has been consolidated with Abbott v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 12:13 pm by Guest Author
But that record has evaporated thanks to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:22 am by Jon Sands
DJ SDNY, with Schroeder and Gould)What profits are there in fraud? [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm by Jon Sands
  Nor was he permitted to compare his situation to that of others who had received the discretionary relief he said he would plausibly have also received; that mode of analysis is off the table after United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:25 pm by Jon Sands
  The government therefore failed to show that he intended to remain in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
On Tuesday, the Court dismissed the union organizing case UNITE Here Local 355 v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:35 am by Amy Howe
Rosado Marzán discusses last week’s dismissal of the union organizing case UNITE Here Local 355 v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:39 pm by Russell S. Whittle Esq. MSCC
By letter dated August 20, 2012 from the office of the United States Attorney for the Western District of Louisiana, the Court was advised that HHS/CMS would not participate in the hearing. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm by New York Criminal Defense
Rev. 131, 134 [2010] [collecting empirical data from numerous studies and concluding that “approximately 4500 people are wrongfully convicted every year in the United States due to eyewitness identification”].) [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm by Danielle Wild
Rev. 131, 134 [2010] [collecting empirical data from numerous studies and concluding that “approximately 4500 people are wrongfully convicted every year in the United States due to eyewitness identification”].) [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
  This suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito – all of whom voted to uphold the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]