Search for: "United States v. Harris, et al."
Results 141 - 160
of 275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2013, 6:02 am
Department of Defense to release graphic photos of the slain Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.In a 29-page Memorandum of Decision last year in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:08 pm
Craig Bierko et al., (US District Court, C.D. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:08 pm
Craig Bierko et al., (US District Court, C.D. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 2:54 pm
Garrett, et al, No. 11-20736 (5th Cir. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am
l al-fiqh / by Ihsan Abdul-Wajid Bagby. 1986 v, 244 leaves ; 28 cm. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:29 am
Books Harry Akoh, A History of the Alien Tort Statute Litigations in the United States for Human Rights Violations Committed in Africa 1980-2008 (2009) Michael Koebele, Corporate Responsibility under the Alien Tort Statute (2009) (ebook) Beth Stephens et al., International Human Rights Litigation in U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:42 am
United States Soccer Federation Inc. et al. in 2006, the Court granted a motion to stay the case so it could be arbitrated in two different international sports organizations. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
HARRY M. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:34 pm
The Louisiana Forestry Ass’n et al. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
In Reichle, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
United StatesDocket: 11-955Issue(s): Whether the McCormick v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
United States, which upheld mandatory minimums against an Apprendi challenge. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
Palestinian Authority et al. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:11 am
Feldman filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:39 am
United States, 11-8737, and Gibbs v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:01 am
United States, 11-883; Brito v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
