Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 141 - 160
of 4,245
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
However, in Rucho v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
The IP rights may or may not be transferred when an NFT changes hands depending upon the way the NFT is structured.In the United States, the general rule is an intellectual property right is not transferred unless the patentee, copyright owner, or trademark owner clearly states there is a transfer in a signed writing.Various federal laws govern this process. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
Court Ruling On May 31, 2023, Chief Judge Jon DeGuilio of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana in South Bend ruled that there was no such duty. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:02 pm
Desai, Lee v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
" Registration also enables the trademark holder "to stop the importation into the United States of articles bearing an infringing mark. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
Creative expression through the sale of parody-based dog toys has recently caught the attention of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
A recent unpublished case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit shed light on which parties have the right to make a claim or sue on a commercial insurance policy. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 3:13 am
The Supreme Court decided the case of New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
While the latest version also does not apply to “lawfully present” immigrants, a prior draft only excepted valid visa holders, which would have barred most refugees, asylees, and asylum seekers, all of whom are authorized to live and work in the United States, from renting business space. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:59 pm
On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a unanimous decision in the case of Amgen Inc. et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
The Court is considering if the trademark holder is protected by the Lanham Act or if the toys’ producer instead receives heightened First Amendment protection due to the humorous nature of the dog toys, among other factors.Merrill v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 3:35 pm
Previously, Judge Bumb served for 15 years as an Assistant United States Attorney. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am
§ 1702(a)(1)(B), extends to “any property in which any foreign country or a national thereof has any interest by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am
As Tocqueville observed long before Ken Paxton and his ilk blighted the federal courts, "[s]carcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am
In the United States as well as in Germany, claim construction is resolved by courts as a question of law (not fact). [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:48 am
SEP holders’ innovation incentives The second claim is that SEP holders’ innovation incentives would diminish significantly, or even disappear, if their net royalty income decreased. [read post]
