Search for: "United States v. International Business MacHines" Results 141 - 160 of 332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
If the influence of Elon Musk and the big oil and gas companies has taught us anything, it is that one cannot depend on an independent political system to check business operations, at least not in the United States after the ironically named Citizens United case and its progeny.[28] Consider also the decades-long failure of international governance regimes to regulate the climate problem effectively. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by John Gregory
In general, that means the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), which has led the development of e-commerce law in the world. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am by Lawrence Taylor
It went to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:51 am by gmlevine
United Business Machines, Inc., D2001-0577 (WIPO June 6, 2001); Government of Canada v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Rather than discussing how life will change for various groups of people in America, I want to engage in informed speculation about how the legal system in the United States will look in a few years. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:05 am by Andrew Voth
Cir. 1997); AND The individual infringing and non-infringing components must be sold together so that they constitute a functional unit or are parts of a complete machine or single assembly of parts, Paper Converting Machine Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If a Botswanan GI takes off: Instead of being made by a Botswanan, you will find stuff made by a machine in Botswana. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
It would also allow diplomats and Taiwanese military to display their flag and wear their uniforms while in the United States on official businesses. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
: Federal Administrative Court rulings in CALVI and TRELLEBORG cases (International Law Office) Motion marks: Swiss IPO allows Swisscom to file MPG-file of motion mark in motion (Class 46)   United Kingdom Class dispute over similarity of goods too complex for summary judgment: Daimler AG v Sany Group Co Ltd (Class 46) The war on counterfeits: how much would you spend? [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm by admin
(b) The proceeds of any sale, to the amount of the exemption existing at the time of sale, is exempt from levy, execution, or other process for one year after the receipt of the proceeds by the person entitled to the exemption. (6) The sale and disposition of one homestead does not prevent the selection or purchase of another. (7) For purposes of any claim or action for taxes brought by the United States Internal Revenue Service, a homestead exemption claimed on real… [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents, Investigate Possible Spoliation –… [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(TTABlog) Monarch Casino & Resort - Trademark battle over the fame of ATLANTIS for casino services headed to trial in Nevada District Court: Kerzner International Inc v Monarch Casino & Resort Inc (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Soccer United Marketing – SUM and Major League Soccer sue of Black & Decker over ‘ambush marketing’ (Trademark Blog)   [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Euan Sinclair
For an example, look no further than the celebrated Costeja v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
The Ghost in the Machine As MTP readers will recall, a Silicon Valley lawyer named Renata B. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On 8 April 2025, the ECtHR handed down judgement in the case of Green v The United Kingdom (Application no. 22077/19). [read post]