Search for: "United States v. JD" Results 141 - 160 of 438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 2:00 am by Holly Jones, Senior Legal Editor
” The proclamation restricts entry to the United States of nationals of countries of “identified concern,” including several majority-Muslim nations. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:00 am by Holly Jones, Senior Legal Editor
” The proclamation restricts entry to the United States of nationals of countries of “identified concern,” including several majority-Muslim nations. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:22 am by WIMS
EME Homer City[1] and Seventh, United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 11:21 am by Eric Goldman
[Also,] despite the very real harms that male sex workers faced following the passage of FOSTA, these effects were somewhat mitigated by the continued existence of Rentmen and other advertising platforms based outside the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:48 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Oklahoma v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 1:57 pm by Barry Herman
  First, Deere asserts that the Commission erred in determining whether “all or substantially all of Deere’s sales in the United States were of North American forage harvesters” as set forth in Bourdeau Bros. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:30 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
In January 2008, Staff Management fired Jimenez because she did not have authorization to legally work in the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Lecturer on the Supreme Court of the United States at the Chautauqua Institution. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm by Terry Lenamon / Reba Kennedy
The DSM is a reference work that classifies (by codes) recognized mental disorders in the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:41 am by Patricia Salkin
Advantage alleged that the City’s sign regulations, both factually and as applied, violated Advantage’s protections under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, and the Alabama Constitution of 1901. [read post]