Search for: "United States v. K" Results 141 - 160 of 3,318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2023, 3:42 pm by Ilya Somin
§ 371 makes it illegal for two more people to "conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
This is not unproblematic: the European Union undertakes here the same unilateralism that it used to criticize when previously done by the United States, with the Helms/Burton Act as the most prominent example. [read post]
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), for example, has focused on ESG by investigating and taking action against companies that tout business practices such as consideration of environmental sustainability, but fail, in practice, to live up to their claims. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Frank Cranmer
: on Mrs K Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:39 am by Nicholas Totin
Elite colleges and universities in the United States have been historically reserved for wealthy, predominantly white Americans. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm by Paul Caron
United States, 598 U.S. __ (2023), led it to misinterpret a statute penalizing certain persons... [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:41 pm by Bill Marler
CDC, “Outbreaks of Gastroenteritis Associated with Noroviruses on Cruise Ships – United States, 2002,” MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, Vol. 51, No. 49, pp. 1112-15 (Dec. 13, 2002). [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But, as the United States Supreme Court has observed in a different but related context, the "inappropriate or controversial character of a statement is irrelevant to the question whether it deals with a matter of public concern. [read post]