Search for: "United States v. Lindsay"
Results 141 - 160
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 10:40 am
United States, in which he criticized the Department of Justice for failing to recommend that prisoners such as Dillon be pardoned. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm
Lindsay, Overview of State RPM, ANTITRUST MAGAZINE (Fall 2007); Frank M. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 1:20 pm
Lindsay Harrison, another Biglaw associate who argued before the Court recently, is also out and has litigated LGBT rights cases (e.g., Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
Under the new law, those who may be tried by military commissions are described as "unprivileged enemy belligerents," theoretically a law-of-war term, but here meaning not only individuals who have actually "engaged in hostilities against the United States," but also individuals who have "purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:42 am
Under the new law, those who may be tried by military commissions are described as "unprivileged enemy belligerents," theoretically a law-of-war term, but here meaning not only individuals who have actually "engaged in hostilities against the United States," but also individuals who have "purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:33 am
Although the Supreme Court rejected the habeas-stripping provisions as unconstitutional in Boumediene v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
Commuters Unite! [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:22 pm
In January, Lindsay had the privilege of arguing before the United States Supreme Court -- in her first oral argument ever. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 2:58 pm
See generally United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 984 F.2d 71, 75-76 (2d Cir. 1993); Lindsay v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 9:00 pm
In the midst of a close race for the highest political office in the United States, the ad seeks to express a political viewpoint regarding the perception of Senator Obama. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 10:48 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 4:04 am
In Week One, we focused on the only contested County Court race of Lindsay v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 12:28 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
'Han' Ruling Means That Statute is Constitutional Under Both First Amendment, Commerce Clause
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 10:17 am
Cooks is also presently under indictment in the Northern District of Texas in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
But the Patriot Act amended the SMTJ statute to make clear that it covers overseas bases, at least "with respect to offenses committed by or against a national of the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
(32-CA-19152-1, et al.; 350 NLRB No. 62) Lindsay, CA Aug. 16, 2007. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
