Search for: "United States v. Miller" Results 141 - 160 of 2,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2016, 4:55 pm by William Weinberg
PENAL CODE SECTION 1170 MAY OFFER RELIEF TO THOSE JUVENILES CONVICTED TO LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE I previously discussed the 2012 United States Supreme Court case, Miller v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm by Bill Otis
The Federalist Society asked me to write one paragraph for press distribution about today's decision in Miller v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm by Quinta Jurecic
As to Miller’s position that Congress has not authorized Mueller’s work by statute, the court simply pointed to United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am by Zachary C. Jackson
  This month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected Fifield’s bright line test in the case of Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:17 pm by Brady Iandiorio
Recently, United States District Court Judge Miller ruled in favor of a motion for partial summary judgment in the case of Continental Western Insurance Company v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 5:56 pm
Thirty years later, however, on June 25, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Miller v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 11:48 am by Daniel Miller
Following the Supreme Court of the United States ruling in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:44 am by Howard Bashman
Circuit (Judges Henderson, Rogers and Srinivasan) will hear argument in Miller v. [read post]