Search for: "United States v. One Parcel of Real Property" Results 141 - 160 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Wisconsin, the court employed a multi-factor analysis to uphold a lower court’s ruling that the two contiguous lots at issue in the case should be considered as one parcel, and that no regulatory taking had occurred. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
City of Berkeley (2019) 31 Cal.App.5th 880 Real parties filed for approvals to construct three homes on contiguous parcels in the Berkeley hills. [read post]
City of Berkeley (2019) 31 Cal.App.5th 880 Real parties filed for approvals to construct three homes on contiguous parcels in the Berkeley hills. [read post]
Plaintiffs sued the State Water Resources Control Board (the “Board”), alleging that the board violated the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) by granting a small domestic use registration to real parties-in-interest without first conducting an environmental review. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599 A7936 Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598 A7905 Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597 A7892 Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to… [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
In Section 2202, the PRA provides that the United States owns “Presidential records. [read post]