Search for: "United States v. Padilla"
Results 141 - 160
of 514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2013, 8:04 am
United States being the most well known of modern vintage. [read post]
1 May 2013, 2:14 pm
United States earlier this term and held that Padilla is not retroactive. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 2:05 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 2:05 pm
United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 1:45 pm
United States, No. 12-8543 (7th Cir case no. 11-2328). [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
United States, 12-8543, that concerns the retroactive application of Padilla v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
But in 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:06 pm
United States that the rule announced in Padilla v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
United States, No. 11-820 (Feb. 20, 2013).We've blogged about what I still believe to be the landmark decision of Padilla v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:37 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:38 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
United States, 568 U.S. __ (Feb. 20, 2013), holding that Padilla v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 2:33 pm
United States, Slip Opinion No.: 11-820, from the 7th Circuit holding that their prior decision in Padilla v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 12:07 pm
United States today. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:31 am
Citizens with criminal convictions, the United States Supreme Court recently held in Chaidez v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
These cases follow the 2009 case, Padilla v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 7:37 am
Before reaching the question of Padilla retroactivity, however, the Hernandez court decided an issue that, if I correctly recall, appeared in one form or another in the Fourth Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:49 am
Supreme Court decided in Padilla v. [read post]
