Search for: "United States v. Park Motors" Results 141 - 160 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Will a majority of the Virginia Supreme Court or United States Supreme Court find a way to say that no seizure took place in Middlebrooks? [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am by Law Lady
Chrysler Motors, 30 No. 8 Westlaw Journal Automotive 2, Westlaw Journal Automotive October 12, 2010A state court jury in Fulton County, Ga., has awarded a 77-year-old woman $1.1 million after she was run over by her own 1994 Dodge Intrepid when the gear shift slipped out of the park position. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:32 am by Ben
For a sense of the car model’s popularity, according to sales figures, 13,000 Cadillac XT5 vehicles were sold in the United States during November and December 2016 alone, worth an estimated $500m in revenue for GM. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:23 am by Sam Callahan and Allon Kedem
” Colleen Sinzdak, who argued for the United States in support of LeDure, drew similar skepticism about the ordinary meaning of “use. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Thus, the owner of a shopping center was not liable to a woman who fell on a dirt path leading from the shopping center to a parking lot. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:50 am by SHG
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing explains decision in United States v. $167,070 in United States Currency: It begins with the flimsiest of “reasonable suspicion” and heads downhill after that. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am by Andrew Dickinson
In Jacobs v Motor Insurers Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), Mr Justice Owen applied Rome II’s provisions to reach the conclusion that the compensation to be paid by the MIB (acting as the UK’s compensation body under the Fourth Motor Insurance Directive) to the claimant as a result of an accident in a Spanish shopping centre car park in December 2007 in which the other driver was German (and uninsured) should be assessed in accordance with Spanish law, as… [read post]