Search for: "United States v. Properties Described in Complaints" Results 141 - 160 of 736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Thus, you see in the excellent books by Kennedy and by Shortt and Doughty the inclusion of numerous letters, reports, complaints, petitions and memoranda. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Criminal libel law is often described as essentially dead. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
” In practice, the FBI operates under the distinction that international terrorism is any act of terror ordered by a foreign group or inspired by an ideology that originated overseas, while domestic terrorism is any act of terror inspired by political motivations rooted in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
It is suggested that he is a man of some means – owning properties in Israel and a ‘small property investment portfolio’ in the US. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Turns out plaintiffs, who filed their class-action complaint in state court where requirements to proceed with such suits are more lax, don't want to be in federal court. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Additionally, the United States filed an amicus brief in the case. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Coleman Saunders
This amendment was intended to narrow the expropriation exception of the FSIA to facilitate the temporary exhibit of works of art in the United States, but it also created an exception for claims arising during the Nazi era—defined as Jan. 30, 1933, until May 8, 1945—as Ingrid Wuerth described in Lawfare. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:32 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The position of Hungary and the United States would undo the primary purpose of the FSIA, which Harrington described as eliminating “ad hoc determinations about when courts should exercise jurisdiction over foreign sovereigns based on the foreign policy concerns of the moment. [read post]