Search for: "United States v. Reagan" Results 141 - 160 of 658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  The nation-to-nation relationship we enjoy as tribal nations has never been confined to the borders of the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am by Jorge Miranda
Chapter Nineteen in the 1994 NAFTA is the direct descendent of Chapter Nineteen in the 1988 Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA).[2] Reportedly, Canada would not have entered into CUSFTA had the United States not agreed to binational panel review, and the adoption of this mechanism required the personal intervention of Canadian Prime Minister Mulroney before President Reagan. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am by Marty Lederman
With Monday’s filing of the reply briefs by the government and the intervenors, the briefing in the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm by Doug Kendall
And when conflict is unavoidable, we should not come to do battle with the United States Congress armed only with a test (congruence and proportionality) that has no demonstrable basis in the text of the Constitution and cannot objectively be shown to have been met or failed. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:18 pm by Russell Spivak, Jordan Brunner
    *** Truman Administration   In 1947, the United States was one of two dominant superpowers on the global stage. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:24 am by Diane Marie Amann
The United States is one of 3 countries (the others are Iran and Pakistan) that signed on December 12, 1977, but never ratified. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that… [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
Such an interpretation, the government adds, would have meant that actions taken by Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan during diplomatic crises – Carter denied visas to citizens of Iran, while Reagan barred Cuban citizens from immigrating to the United States – would also have been illegal. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:04 am by Adam Chandler
Reporting and commentary on the import of last month’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]