Search for: "United States v. Sealed Defendant One" Results 141 - 160 of 666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:28 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs moved to proceed pseudonymously, arguing that "in light of … one Plaintiff's extensive work on behalf of the United States" and plaintiffs' minority status, revealing their identities would increase the risks of violent attacks against them in Pakistan by terrorist groups hostile to the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by Cindy Cohn
United States: When the United States Supreme Court quotes you in upholding privacy, that’s a big win. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:18 am by Dan Harris
To accomplish this, the US party must submit the following to China’s Ministry of Justice: a completed United States Marshall Form USM? [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:18 am by Dan Harris
To accomplish this, the US party must submit the following to China’s Ministry of Justice: a completed United States Marshall Form USM? [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:47 pm
Additionally, the doctor states that in some "isolated cases" the seroconversion process can take as long as one year. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:57 pm by Florian Mueller
Ericsson said some of Apple's claim construction and validity arguments were untimely.ALJ Bhattacharyya's decisions are sealed for the time being, but the following screenshot from the ITC docket shows the outcome (click on the image to enlarge):This is not a good pretrial outcome for Apple.Starting Monday, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas will hold an Ericsson v. [read post]