Search for: "United States v. Sotomayor" Results 141 - 160 of 3,437
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm by Ronald Mann
Justice Samuel Alito, for example, asked whether “there [had] been real cases in which the United States has criminally prosecuted itself,” and Chief Justice John Roberts asked (to laughter) “what would the pre-sentencing report look like” if “the United States were convicted? [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am by John Elwood
Justice Sonia Sotomayor filed a brief opinion respecting the denial of certiorari, emphasizing that the Supreme Court had squarely reserved that issue when deciding that same case during an earlier trip to the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 7:01 am by Amy Howe
His claims included an FTCA claim against the United States as well as a claim under Bivens v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Republicans Fail to Coalesce Around Speaker Choice, Leaving House in Limbo MSN – Marianna Sotomayor, Leigh Ann Caldwell, and Jaqueline Alemany (Washington Post) | Published: 10/11/2023 House Republicans were on the verge of open revolt after the ideologically fractious conference failed to coalesce around a speaker nominee, leaving the chamber rudderless and leaderless. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am by cassieq
Ruiz, Jr. was the first Hispanic attorney to argue before the United States Supreme Court in Buck v. [read post]
It manages railroad track across the eastern United States, including thousands of miles of track in Pennsylvania. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am by Will Baude
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Michael McConnell, Sam Bray, and I recently completed and posted the 2023 online supplement to our constitutional law casebook: The Constitution of the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:38 am by DONALD SCARINCI
While Justice Sotomayor supported the judgement, she argued that the Lanham Act may apply to overseas infringement where there is a likelihood of consumer confusion in the United States. [read post]