Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Co." Results 141 - 160 of 415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am by Bexis
  The “FDA is a regulatory agency whose mandate is to control which drugs are marketed in the United States and how they are marketed. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913, 940 n.13 (2005); Standard Oil Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
If the influence of Elon Musk and the big oil and gas companies has taught us anything, it is that one cannot depend on an independent political system to check business operations, at least not in the United States after the ironically named Citizens United case and its progeny.[28] Consider also the decades-long failure of international governance regimes to regulate the climate problem effectively. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by MOTP
IB further asserted that Dillard, shortly after funding the account, began a trading strategy that consisted of buying and selling mining company stocks and oil and mineral futures. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States, shareholder primacy continues to define the legal standard.[15] “While many deplored the disconnect between corporate power and social need, and CSR . . . became a more frequent discussion topic in corporate and academic circles, not many corporations acted meaningfully in pursuing CSR. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
In the Curse of Bigness, Wu rejects the consumer-focused account of the Sherman Act articulated in Standard Oil v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Sean Wajert
  Customary international law includes only those standards, rules or customs affecting the relationship between states or between an individual and a foreign state, and used by those states for their common good and/or in dealings inter se. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:45 pm by Mark Murakami
United States v. $184,505.01 in the United States Currency, 72 F.3d 1160 (3rd Cir. 1995)(original opinion (here)):  this is an asset forfeiture case arising from an in rem proceeding against cash. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]