Search for: "United States v. TIME-DC, INC."
Results 141 - 160
of 272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:30 am
Acanac Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:50 am
Hudson Valley is the largest foie gras producer in the United States and markets its foie gras as “the humane choice. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
Time, Inc., involving a quack exposed by Life magazine; reporters surreptitiously recorded what was going on. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Porpoise Evans Currently before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Compare this to, say, the fair use provision in §107, which has generated over 300 published opinions in the same time-frame.6 And less than one-third of these involved consumer goods. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:04 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., despite Hurricane Sandy’s imminent arrival and the fact the entire federal government in Washington DC is shut down today. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am
Proponents of this fallacy (such as the sponsors of the IRFA bill) leave out the July 6, 2012 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:08 pm
Novartis, Inc., C.A. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
" Back in the United States, politicians are walking on eggshells. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:47 pm
The opinion in Campbell-Crane & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:08 pm
§ 101 The United States Supreme Court issued a significant, unanimous decision yesterday in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 11:30 am
It is important to understand which folks are supervisors before organizing occurs as the employer in Veritas Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 11:30 am
It is important to understand which folks are supervisors before organizing occurs as the employer in Veritas Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
Kim Kardashian v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:53 am
United States, 371 U.S. 156, 168 (1962)). [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
When no delivery time is stated, then delivery time equals reasonable time.MES also contests the award of lost profits for the second batch of units, given that MES merely repudiated that portion of the contract. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
(A New York Times account of the accused’s ordeal is here.) [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am
Loving Care Agency, Inc. [read post]
