Search for: "United States v. Tam"
Results 141 - 160
of 916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2012, 6:33 am
The United States intervened in a qui tam suit alleging False Claims Act violations against Renal Care and the subsidiary. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:08 am
Bartlett v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:16 am
Recently, however,in United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:25 pm
Reed Smith’s Life Sciences Legal Update blog discusses a recent decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio that may make it much harder for qui tam relators to rely upon stolen medical records or patient information in False Claims Act ("FCA") whistleblower actions. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:59 am
On June 2, 2011, Judge Eduardo Robreno from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed plaintiff’s qui tam action on the same constitutional grounds. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:05 pm
However, the implications of this court decision, United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm
In doing so, the Federal Circuit established broad standing for private individuals seeking to pursue qui tam actions for false patent marking on behalf of the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 6:25 pm
United States ex rel Sanders , a qui tam case pending in the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
Solutions, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
” The lawsuit is captioned United States and State of California ex rel. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
The claim in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court issued its decision today in United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
The Supreme Court issued its ruling in United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
The Supreme Court issued its ruling in United States ex rel. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:18 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
The United States Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:30 am
United States 16-1398 Issues: (1) Whether a qui tam realtor’s complaint under the False Claims Act satisfies Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) by alleging nothing more than the opportunity for fraud, as held by the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:30 pm
" United States ex. rel. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:01 pm
" Randall Little and Joel Arnold on behalf of the United States v. [read post]
