Search for: "United States v. Territory of VI" Results 141 - 160 of 321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2012, 6:09 am by Rosalind English
Courts unhesitatingly pronounce on the legality or otherwise of foreign states’ actions -  Abbasi v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
  OEIGWG CHAIRMANSHIP SECOND REVISED DRAFT 06.08.2020 LEGALLY BINDING INSTRUMENT TO REGULATE, IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, THE ACTIVITIES OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES Preamble The State Parties to this (Legally Binding Instrument),Reaffirming the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations; Recalling the nine core International Human Rights Instruments adopted by the United Nations, and the eight… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am by ronaldrichenburg
  The possible extension of slavery into the territories (i.e. those parts of the United States that had not yet become states) became increasingly controversial as the 19th century progressed, and by the 1850s had become the burning issue in American politics. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am by ronaldrichenburg
  The possible extension of slavery into the territories (i.e. those parts of the United States that had not yet become states) became increasingly controversial as the 19th century progressed, and by the 1850s had become the burning issue in American politics. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:23 am by Cornell Overfield
  Every state with a coast in the Arctic Ocean appears eligible for extended continental shelves, and all but the U.S. have so far made the necessary submissions in accordance with the procedures laid out in UNCLOS Part VI. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
“Foreign person” means anyone that is not a United States citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident; any individual admitted to the United States as a refugee under 8 U.S.C. 1157 or granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158; any entity organized solely under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches); or any person in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
United States In the United States, successful legislative reform in Oregon, Vermont, and Washington has encouraged other states to consider passing permissive assisted suicide legislation. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 60 [week ending on Sunday 23 August] - Test-drive of the Unitary Patent Court, Parts V and VI |From food porn to porn with food: passion with Parmesan | USPTO Guidelines on patent eligibility | Red Bull fends off Crazy Bull in Greece | Biker Biker Biker Gang! [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Although a State appellate court has awarded a remedy for invasion of privacy on the basis of the equitable action of breach of confidence (Giller v Procopets (Vic)), that does not mean privacy has crystallised into a straightforward, juridified right in Australia: breach of confidence still requires a pre-existing relationship of confidence to bind the defendant vis-à-vis dissemination of the relevant information. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
However, calling them human rights violations, particularly under the ICCPR, would imply that the ICCPR applies extraterritorially (outside of areas under the responsible government’s “territory and jurisdiction”), which runs against the official position of the United States and some other governments. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 4:07 am by David Fraser
Allies in the United States, Britain, Australia and New Zealand are confronting the same issues, Paulson added. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 9:43 pm by Josh Blackman
This question is somewhat difficult as an original matter, because it isn't clear if these territorial judges are even "officers of the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:01 am by Maksym Vishchyk
., Russia’s proxies in Ukrainian territory largely occupied by Russia. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:25 am by Almudena Azcárate Ortega
On Oct. 13, the Artemis Accords Principles for a Safe, Peaceful, and Prosperous Future, commonly referred to as the Artemis Accords, were signed by their eight founding member states: Australia, Canada, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]