Search for: "United States v. Tucker"
Results 141 - 160
of 382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2015, 6:06 pm
Ruiz, 710 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2013), United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:22 am
United States, and remanded the case to the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:29 pm
The United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:40 am
United States; Shell Oil Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 7:02 am
Miss United States of Am., LLC (9th Cir. 2022). [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:51 pm
Last week, this cert. petition (with appendix) was filed in the case of Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:36 pm
From today's decision in Eknes-Tucker v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 11:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
United States, 290 U.S. 13 (1933) (allowing a property owner to directly bring a Fifth Amendment claim for compensation upon the taking of the property, without pursuing, for example, the state-litigation requirement as contemplated in Williamson County)[13]; First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
He then took up the first issue in the case, noting that the Court of Federal Claims is acourt of limited jurisdiction that, pursuant to the Tucker Act, may hear `any claim against the United States founded upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract with the United States, or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:18 pm
The Tucker Act (and its identical language in the Little Tucker Act) waives sovereign immunity for three types of claims, namely claims “[1] founded either upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress or any regulation of an executive department, or [2] upon any express or implied contract with the United States, or [3] for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort. [read post]
17 May 2008, 9:38 pm
United States, 364 U.S. 40, 49 (1960). [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 12:00 am
The two prior decisions in this matter, addressing the issue of who should decide whether an agreement permits class arbitration, align well with the United States Supreme Court’s January 9, 2019 holding in Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 10:50 am
-Federal v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 1:16 pm
The dissent argued that the certified order from the Court of Federal Claims did not confer appellate jurisdiction over the earlier dismissal of infringement claims against the United States, citing United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 3:39 pm
The United States Supreme Court decided two antitrust cases for October Term 2020. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 9:32 am
United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:32 am
The United States v Miller’s Organic Farm and Amos Miller’s next such hearing will be on September 26 At this one, Amos Miller of Bird-in-Hand, PA must have his $305,000 fine paid up or he risks going to jail. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 12:01 am
United States, No. 06-898C (Nov. 19, 2007). [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 6:46 am
The petitions of the week are: Tucker v. [read post]
