Search for: "United States v. Two Parcels of Property"
Results 141 - 160
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:23 pm
Here, although the Board identified two primary reasons for its denial of the initial application: that the campground was not open to the general public and the initial application presented park model units with a greater amount of permanency than what is intended in the Thornton Campground Regulations and State statutes, it was clear that the Board’s principal concern was the permanency and relative immobility of the proposed park model units. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm
In most coastal states, ownership of beachfront property is split between the state and private parties. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
Today the court hears oral argument in two cases. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 10:48 am
United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm
United States, 91 U.S. 367 (1875). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am
Sigalit v Kahlon Last week, in Sigalit v Kahlon, 21-cv-08921 (SDNY Aug. 30, 2023) United States District Judge Analisa Torres granted the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on an accounting claim. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 9:40 pm
Construing the policy in favor of the insureds and resolving all ambiguities in the insureds' favor, as we must (see United States Fid. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:30 am
Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:20 am
Or does the existence of inexpensive drones present a novel Fourth Amendment concern that will require a novel doctrine to address it, as the Supreme Court arguably charted new courses regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Most all agree that the United States Supreme Court will ultimately decide the question of the legitimacy of the Rule. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:20 am
Nonetheless, the court found that the filed declaration–stating Chesapeake’s intent to add Plaintiffs’ properties to a previously-existing “unit” of land on which operations had unquestionably commenced—constituted an act “similar to or incidental to acts . . . [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:37 pm
Even while ordering the transfer, Congress officially designated the one acre plot with the cross as “a national memorial commemorating United States participation in World War I and honoring the American veterans of that war. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 1:38 pm
Anthony argued that the statute of limitations on the initial wrong, the condo association's representation that it was insured, was tolled by the ongoing damaged state of the property. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:10 am
Confer's affidavit stating that when he and his wife purchased the property, they agreed the fence line represented the boundary between the two parcels. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 10:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm
Banning Ranch is a 400-acre piece of property which abuts the proposed park parcel. [read post]
