Search for: "United States v. Vasquez"
Results 141 - 160
of 164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2009, 8:25 am
The District Court agreed and dismissed Count One, and the Eleventh Circuit affirmed in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am
United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Vasquez, 199 F.3d 1024, 1028 n.7 (9th Cir. 1999); United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:13 pm
Despite the passengers' efforts to contact the United States Coast Guard through the internet service onboard the ship, and despite reporting the distressed boaters to a crewmember, the passengers are trying to figure out how this large cruise ship failed to initiate any rescue efforts. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
United States, 376 U.S. 364, 367 (1964). [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Vasquez, No. 072796 Conviction for drug and gun offenses is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the district court should have suppressed his statements acknowledging that the drugs were his, his admission that he possessed the gun and the gun itself; and 2) the evidence was insufficient to show that the gun defendant surrendered at his arrest was carried during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime. . [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Mukasey Immigration & Naturalization Service 08a0059p.06 Vasquez Salazar v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 4:56 am
U.S., 267 U.S. 132 (1925), the rationale for the border search exception is that the United States – like other sovereign countries – is entitled to stop travelers at the border and search them and their belongings to ensure that contraband is not being brought into or taken out of the country. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
” Vasquez v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 6:55 pm
" Apparently, the only judicial decision on the meaning of "part or parts" in the FFA was United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:15 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri agreed. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
State Water Resources (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 342, 359; Bridges v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:15 pm
The rate on Carnival ships is higher than the average per capita rape rate in the United States of around 27 of 100,000. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
Standard of ReviewTrial courts have always been afforded broad discretion in the granting of new trials, and may exercise such discretion “in the interests of justice and fairness” without stating any other reason. [read post]
