Search for: "Unknown Companies, Et Al." Results 141 - 160 of 239
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Reciting Articles 65(2) and 76 CTMR, it observed that the Court’s scrutiny is limited to the facts, evidence and arguments brought by the parties during the previous proceedings, and to the matters of law thereby examined (Case T-57/03, Société provençale d’achat et de gestion (SPAG) SAS v OHIM). [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 9:44 am by Antoinette Konski
These are variations of unknown significance (termed “VUS”) and are valuable to those tested and to other researchers who are trying to interpret the unknown variations. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 9:43 am by Ron Raether
Morgan, et al., the plaintiff had been the CEO of a banking education company. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm by Law Lady
SUJATA KUMAR, Appellee. 2nd District.Dissolution of marriage -- Discovery -- Where, because of his being a convicted felon, husband resigned from his official ownership positions in companies which had been operated by husband and wife during marriage, and wife terminated husband from any position of importance in companies upon husband's filing for divorce, it was a departure from essential requirements of law for trial court to grant protective orders denying husband… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Marty Lederman
If the government prohibits insurance companies from taking account of medical history and pre-existing conditions in setting rates, persons who purchase such insurance will disproportionately be those with current, acute (and expensive) medical needs. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:51 am by Susan F. Mandiberg
Southern Union and its amici, the Chamber of Commerce et al., predict that this situation will increase the bargaining leverage of prosecutors and result in more innocent defendants pleading guilty. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm by Law Lady
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, Appellee. 4th District.Mortgage foreclosure -- No abuse of discretion in ordering sequestration of rents -- Lack of standing is affirmative defense to foreclosure, and trial court should refrain from conclusively ruling on affirmative defenses in ruling on motion to sequester rentsTIDEWATER ESTATES CO-OP, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, and all other unknown parties including claimants, persons or parties, natural or corporate, or whose legal status is… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by Pace Law School Library
  The known “unknowns” of hydraulic fracturing:  a case for a traditional subsurface trespassregime in Pennsylvania. [read post]