Search for: "Unknown Persons or Claimants" Results 141 - 160 of 561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Various Claimants v VM Morrisons Supermarkets plc Mr Skelton, a Morrisons employee with a grudge, downloaded payroll data containing personal details of 100,000 Morrisons’ employees (such as names, addresses, NI numbers, salary details and dates of birth), onto a personal USB stick and uploaded this data onto a public file-sharing website. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
As the court made clear in Terry v Person Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)), any application for such derogation should be supported by evidence in an application. [read post]
The present case (C-182/22 and 189/22) arose from a data breach that caused an individual’s personal data, including his name, date of birth, and a copy of his identity card, to be accessed by an unknown third party. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am by INFORRM
It was therefore argued that TNL should be prevented from using the information, partly to protect the rights of unnamed and unknown individuals. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm by INFORRM
As Eady J said in X & Y v Persons Unknown[2006] EWHC 2783 (QB), [2007] EMLR 290 at para 72: “…the Spycatcher doctrine [Attorney-General v Newspaper Publishing Plc [1988] Ch 333 at 375, 380] would go on inhibiting third parties from publishing the relevant information notionally pending a trial which would never actually take place. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:20 pm by MacIsaac
 ICBC, in the place of the unknown motorist, was found liable for the collision. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:18 am by INFORRM
  In this case (unlike the decision in Terry v Persons Unknown), the claimant denied the allegations of an extra-marital affair and further filed evidence that the Defendant was seeking to blackmail him. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
A lot of this has to do with the fear of the unknown. [read post]
17 May 2018, 10:36 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
” (Miriam-Webster defines idiopathic as an injury “arising spontaneously or from an obscure or unknown case. [read post]
17 May 2018, 10:36 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
” (Miriam-Webster defines idiopathic as an injury “arising spontaneously or from an obscure or unknown case. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  When you have a case where surgery failed, there is very little chance that your claimant will ever be medication free. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 7:29 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
   In addition, the claimant didn’t have the freedom to put forward a given individual. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Whilst the disclosure did not include the name of the claimant, it was found that  “personal data can relate to more than one person and does not have to relate exclusively to one data subject, particularly when the group referred to is small. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Judge rejected the submission that a claimant has to prove that at least one person understood the words complained of to refer to him. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 6:27 am by SJM
Finally, the CoA heard the appeal shortly before the decision of the High Court in Manchester Ship Canal Developments v Persons Unknown [2014] EWHC 645 (Ch) (our note here), where HHJ Pelling QC clearly considered himself bound by the CoA’s decision in Malik v Fassenfelt to conclude that Art.8 was capable of being engaged in relation to land owned by a private landowner. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:51 am by INFORRM
She cited the judgment of Tugendhat J in Terry v Persons Unknown and in particular paragraph 139 in which he said: If a prohibition of the disclosure of the making of the injunction is included in an order for the purpose of preventing tipping off, and if the order provides for a return date (as the Practice Direction envisages) then the prohibition on disclosure may normally be expected to expire once the alleged wrongdoer has been served with an injunction, or at the return date… [read post]