Search for: "Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA"
Results 141 - 160
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
The parties on NAM’s side of the case include agricultural companies and trade associations, electric utilities, states and environmental groups – all frequent challengers of EPA decisions. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Wagner, University of Texas at Austin School of Law Court disregards the Clean Air Act’s clear language in applying the major questions doctrine to curb EPA’s climate authority. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:26 pm
EPA, GHGs are an “air pollutant” under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
EPA, 14-46, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
But it was the ruling’s impact on utility regulation, not the cost, that prompted the appeals court to reverse the decision. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:56 am
Commentary on Monday’s decision in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:16 am
Power Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
The EPA requires farmers to follow disposal instructions provided by the pesticide manufacturer. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:14 am
EPA and EPA v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
EPA, 14-46, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Vol. 2, No. 20, July 19, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
New York (06-736) and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm
Oregon, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
In Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
The utility will also pay up to $100,000 for consultants – picked jointly by the utility and the activists — to critique the plan and advise the activists about any new problems. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Second, we present evidence on public-company disclosures consistent with issuers’ understanding that the SEC has long had authority to take regulatory action in this area. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Jacobs covers last week’s grant in a trio of cases – brought by Michigan, the National Mining Association, and the Utility Air Regulatory Group – presenting the question “whether EPA should have taken into account compliance costs before proceeding with . . regulations” intended to limit power plants’ emissions of (among other things) mercury. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
